Abduction research

by Nicholas Reiter

The following excerpts are a summary of the research underway by Nicholas Reiter. Nicholas is a graduate of Terra Technical College, and is a professional research technologist for a solar cell manufacturing firm. He about thirty years old and has been interested in the UFO phenomena all his life. The following is a brief of the summarization of his research as outlined in Dr. David Gotlib's Bulletin of Anomalous Experience; "Magnetic Implant Response" and "Magnetism, UFO Abductions and the Anomalous". Nicholas does not belong to any large UFO group ( e.g. MUFON, CUFOS, etc. ) and has been involved in this research for the past three years. Some of the following "quoted" passages are directly from sources listed above.

New observations which may well be some of the most significant discoveries made in regard to abductions, UFOS and mind control were first investigated in the Autumn of 1990. These tests and experiments were performed by Nicholas Reiter and his colleague (AR) in the Dallas area with confirmed abductees using a techniques that can easily be duplicated.

The objectives of these two were:

Assumptions for the research/experimentation: The first set of experiments involved trying to find a means to elicit a tangible objective response from abduction implant devices. AR first noticed a "weird" sensation in her volunteers when a large ( flux density measured at approx. 2000 gauss) horseshoe magnet had been held up to the region of the volunteers head where, under hypnosis, the volunteer had recalled aliens "doing something to her". The sensation was extraordinary vivid and disturbing to the volunteer. It seemed to be both mental and physiological in nature. In nearest terms it was a "panic" response, a mental feeling of terror or extreme apprehension, coupled with a verified rise in pulse rate and perspiration.

The volunteer (V#1), said that the panic response seemed to duplicate the feeling that she had been subject to in the past, shortly before an abduction related event would occur. Over the course of the following weeks several different tests were conducted with the subject V#1.

Nicholas and AR then started testing other volunteers in Jan 1991. Previous to this their research was being performed with the assistance of V#1 only. On Jan 8, they tested another confirmed volunteer. No communication was allowed between V#1 and V#2. The symptoms experienced by V#2 were identical to those of V#1.

Over the course of the next few months, two other volunteers were tested. V#3 showed a positive reaction with consistent symptoms. V#4 however, felt no response or sensations.

Nicholas and AR started researching the nature of the abductions experienced by all volunteers. They found that V#1, V#2 and V#3 were "classical" abductees, though their specific experiences and ordeals were different. Each recalled, during either their regression, or waking memories, the phenomena most often experienced by those who have been repeatedly abducted (e.g. Grey entities, quasi-medical protocols, possible implant insertion, etc.). V#4's abduction experience were quite "non-standard" and may involve different phenomena.

It was decided that the research should then continue. The second phase of experimentation continued. AR reported the following; V#1 was placed in a chair, and was tested for MIR. Results were positive. An 18 inch tall Tesla spark gap coil was set up in front on V#1. The coil was turned on and allowed to operate for several minutes ( then coil's power was adjusted to produce a 4 inch discharge at the secondary. Exact construction details are available from Nicholas Reiter).

V#1 was then checked for MIR and the results were negative. The MIR had vanished. V#1 was checked again 24 hours later and the results were still negative. The nullifying effect lasted for approximately six days. When it DID return it was at a much diminished magnitude. From this observation it was inferred that the MIR had not been eliminated, but had been in some way deadened or temporarily stunned.

V#2 was similarly tested with the Tesla coil and the results were identical. The MIR ceased for a period of time.

Another interesting effect was noticed by V#1. She was given the Tesla coil to take home with her. On several occasions, specifically on certain evenings V#1 would get the feeling that unseen entities were nearby. She found that by switching on the tesla coil, the sensation would vanish, as though the coil was disrupting or driving away the invisible force.

This concludes the studies performed by Nicholas Reiter in conjunction with AR.

Nicholas has continued his research. Lack of volunteers prompted him to start research in a slightly different vein. He started testing subjects randomly, business associates, friends, family, and people on the street were tested with some surprising results.

The subjects were told that some people have the ability to "sense" magnetic fields for unknown reasons and that he (Nicholas) would like to determine if they ( the volunteers/subjects) can detect them as well.

The volunteers were placed in a comfortable chair. A galvanic skin response indicator was placed on the second and third fingers of the left hand. The volunteer was then shown the magnet (similar to the one used in the original experiments). The volunteer is asked to verbalize any feelings or sensations which they might experience during the test. The subject is then blindfolded and a few minutes are allowed to let the galvanic skin response monitor to "settle out".

At this point, the magnet is then moved slowly and randomly around the head. Spacing is kept at two inches at all times from the subjects head. Sensations, feelings and GSP monitor response are observed and recorded. When the test is completed the volunteers are thanked and released. If permitted the age, sex, occupation and names were recorded.

Out of the first 24 subjects tested 5 showed a positive response to this procedure. One or more of the following characteristics were noted in each case;

None of the five random positive response cases were totally identical in symptom. However, the following characteristics were common in all five cases; The areas included were: The above test results were obtained during 1991 and published that same year. further testing is being done at this time
Back one page